Page 44 of 79
Posted: January 6th, 2010, 3:13 pm
by HerrHerr
I figure we could even split it up over a couple of weekends. Like watch 4 episodes (three hours)
and make up some drinking games. Like every time Sawyer has a shirt off, you have to chug a beer.
Or every time Jacob's name is mentioned, take a drink.
If you see a smoke monster, do some smack.
You know...
Posted: January 7th, 2010, 2:03 am
by Rev. Jordan T. Maxwell
majcher wrote:hujhax wrote:
I think this is the season where we finally learn which of the Sterling Cooper employees is a Cylon, no?
Come on, it's clearly the same model that tried to marry and knock out Captain Reynolds before Kate basically did the exact same thing to him.
Full circle!
well, fortunately he's been able to parlay those experiences into a lucrative mystery writing/crime solving career...
(i thought about trying a multi tiered Alan Tudyk reference, but was afraid the universe might collapse on itself.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec329/ec32973d395cf105241273806ce2131e50f59dba" alt="Razz :P"
)
Posted: January 7th, 2010, 7:32 pm
by Marc Majcher
What?
[youtube]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GcatQSyRK6c[/youtube]
Dude.
[youtube]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijEm--7rzuI[/youtube]
Play simultaneously for full effect.
Posted: January 8th, 2010, 4:08 pm
by hujhax
valetoile wrote:So are we going to have a big Season premiere watching party? Whooooo!
w00t! I'll probably
watch it at the Drafthouse, but will happily join any viewing-party post-show discussion already in progress.
--
peter rogers @ work | http://hujhax.livejournal.com
We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful what we pretend to be.
-- Kurt Vonnegut
Posted: January 9th, 2010, 11:39 am
by valetoile
yay! I was hoping for an alamo showing, but couldn't find any info on it. I will be there.
Posted: January 12th, 2010, 3:19 pm
by hujhax
Coverage of the LOST panel at the TCA Press Tour.
(Possible spoilers, if you consider casting news to be spoilers.)
--
peter rogers @ work | http://hujhax.livejournal.com
We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful what we pretend to be.
-- Kurt Vonnegut
Posted: January 12th, 2010, 4:59 pm
by Jeff
Although I have a pretty strong suspicion about who all will be returning--
from the dead!-- I do consider casting news to be spoilery, so I won't be checking out that link. Thanks for the link and the warning!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/654ab/654ab1792415ca7fa42d1efcc862dee70f21f91d" alt="Smile :)"
Posted: January 12th, 2010, 7:11 pm
by HerrHerr
C'mon, dudes, everyone knows that everyone's returning.
Especially ALL of the dead people.
That includes Jakob.
And baby Walt.
Posted: January 12th, 2010, 9:34 pm
by LuBu McJohnson
HerrHerr wrote:C'mon, dudes, everyone knows that everyone's returning.
Especially ALL of the dead people.
That includes Jakob.
And baby Walt.
If Walt doesn't come back, I will be ultra mad
Posted: January 13th, 2010, 9:46 am
by HerrHerr
LOST THEORY
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
Why does Richard Alpert not age? Because just like the Sawyer '77 posse, he has already traveled back in time from a time later than
Sawyer and gang went back in time. He will meet himself again in the future (which has already occurred) in the final conflict which will
involve the island reversing back to a much earlier time than we have seen yet--maybe to the point of the temples being built--the origin
of Jakob basically. This means that Saywer and '77 posse will not age until they reach the time when Ben moved the island. That
they will meet the second versions of themselves who survive the second time the Oceanic crashes--only they will meet the versions of
themselves who have now been influenced by Jacob (meaning that Jacob visited everybody back in the United States AFTER the island
stopped moving in time and "landed" in 1977).
So, there are influences in time. I think Jacob is probably good and hopes this go around in the loop is one where the visitors make the right
decision--whatever that is exactly. I have no idea for sure what time Sun and posse land in. Has there been a clue yet?
Posted: January 13th, 2010, 5:39 pm
by Jeff
HerrHerr wrote:LOST THEORY
Why does Richard Alpert not age? Because just like the Sawyer '77 posse, he has already traveled back in time from a time later than
Sawyer and gang went back in time. He will meet himself again in the future (which has already occurred) in the final conflict which will
involve the island reversing back to a much earlier time than we have seen yet--maybe to the point of the temples being built--the origin
of Jakob basically. This means that Saywer and '77 posse will not age until they reach the time when Ben moved the island. That
they will meet the second versions of themselves who survive the second time the Oceanic crashes--only they will meet the versions of
themselves who have now been influenced by Jacob (meaning that Jacob visited everybody back in the United States AFTER the island
stopped moving in time and "landed" in 1977).
So, there are influences in time. I think Jacob is probably good and hopes this go around in the loop is one where the visitors make the right
decision--whatever that is exactly. I have no idea for sure what time Sun and posse land in. Has there been a clue yet?
I don't quite follow... we should talk!
Posted: January 17th, 2010, 11:52 pm
by LuBu McJohnson
nizice.
EDIT:
Oh man, this already came up in discussion.
Posted: January 19th, 2010, 7:23 pm
by Chelley
Lost fans become even more annoying this season, says The Onion.
http://www.theonion.com/content/video/f ... videoembed[/youtube]
Posted: January 19th, 2010, 10:15 pm
by Michael T
SPOILER! They mentioned the (previously released) name of this season's first episode. If you want nothing seen nor heard, don't watch it.
Also it was funny. As well as true.
Posted: January 20th, 2010, 9:26 am
by hujhax
LOST fans might find this amusing:
ack_attack's recaps of various LOST episodes.
--
peter rogers @ work | http://hujhax.livejournal.com
What concerns me is that snark functions as a device to punish human spontaneity, eccentricity, non-conformity and simple error. Everyone is being snarked into line.
-- Roger Ebert