Sully wrote:The reason I asked initially is that I see and hear people referring to someone doing a harold when they did not do the structure as charted and I am still curious what makes it a harold if its not in that structure. I think the answer is something like support, organic gamey stuff and theme, but i don't know. I'm just a simple caveman lawyer.
Having never done a Harold, allow me to answer.
These days, there's the concept of the "training wheels Harold" and the "modern Harold." Some people use other terms ("old school" Tom would say). Whatever.
But the idea is that the rigid structure is there for those starting out, to get a feel for how the shape of show can flow and to internalize the basic beats. And for many, that's totally enough to satisfy them and they don't feel the need to move on.
But then, once it's comfortable and second nature and all that, you can let it go. And even more beautifully, you can make a show become whatever it wants to be... which means that if a show becomes a series of scenes with occasional breakouts to talk directly to God, then it can become that. Or if wants to be a mono-scene with very few pop-outs then it does become that. The show finds its own structure in the moment.
And then you always have the "old school"/"training wheels" Harold structure to fall back on, if need be.
So people still call The Reckoning a Harold team, even though what they're doing usually doesn't resemble the classic structure.
Does that sound about right?