Skip to content

New mammal discovered

Everything else, basically.

Moderators: arclight, happywaffle

  • User avatar
  • mcnichol Offline
  • Posts: 1148
  • Joined: July 28th, 2005, 10:35 am
  • Location: -------------->
  • Contact:

New mammal discovered

Post by mcnichol »

This shouldn't excite me as much as it does!

Image

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4501152.stm

BBC News wrote:WWF caught two images of the animal, which is bigger than a domestic cat, dark red, and has a long muscular tail.

Local people, the WWF says, had not seen the species before, and researchers say it looks to be new.

"You don't find new mammals that often, and to do so must be extraordinary," said Callum Rankine, head of the species programme at WWF-UK.
Last edited by mcnichol on May 12th, 2013, 2:35 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post by Wesley »

I saw that on Drudge yesterday as I was flipping through the news and I saw the pic real quick and read the caption about "new animal discovered" and my first thought was "OH SWEET! They found a baby Brontosaurus!"

Only when I clicked through did I realise that was a tail, not a neck, and that I was looking at it backwards. I was so let down.
Last edited by Wesley on May 12th, 2013, 2:35 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post by erikamay »

They found a baby Brontosaurus!
weird. i thought that too.
WWF caught two images of the animal, which is bigger than a domestic cat, dark red, and has a long muscular tail.
why is the WWF looking for animals? isnt wrasslin' people enough?

heheh!

urhf...hmmm....gurgle (walks out of room) pffft.

erika "threadkiller" mcnichol
Last edited by erikamay on May 12th, 2013, 2:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
  • User avatar
  • kaci_beeler Offline
  • Posts: 2151
  • Joined: September 4th, 2005, 10:27 pm
  • Location: Austin, TX
  • Contact:

Post by kaci_beeler »

erikamay wrote:why is the WWF looking for animals? isnt wrasslin' people enough?
ha
you beat me to it
Last edited by kaci_beeler on May 12th, 2013, 2:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
  • User avatar
  • sara farr Offline
  • Posts: 3080
  • Joined: August 14th, 2005, 9:49 pm
  • Location: ATX

Post by sara farr »

THAT'S A CINNAMON COATED LEMUR!! Duh!

I just checked and was RIGHT (sort of).

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... photo.html
Last edited by sara farr on May 12th, 2013, 2:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
  • User avatar
  • kaci_beeler Offline
  • Posts: 2151
  • Joined: September 4th, 2005, 10:27 pm
  • Location: Austin, TX
  • Contact:

Post by kaci_beeler »

Cinnamon coated?
*drools*

That new mammal won't be around for much longer.
Last edited by kaci_beeler on May 12th, 2013, 2:35 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post by Wesley »

They are great dipped in coffee.

Mmmmmmm...
Last edited by Wesley on May 12th, 2013, 2:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
  • User avatar
  • phlounderphil Offline
  • Posts: 621
  • Joined: August 15th, 2005, 3:07 am
  • Location: Austin
  • Contact:

Post by phlounderphil »

And I shall name you...Snickerdoodle.
Last edited by phlounderphil on May 12th, 2013, 2:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
  • User avatar
  • phlounderphil Offline
  • Posts: 621
  • Joined: August 15th, 2005, 3:07 am
  • Location: Austin
  • Contact:

Post by phlounderphil »

Or maybe name you...Biscotti
Last edited by phlounderphil on May 12th, 2013, 2:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
  • User avatar
  • sara farr Offline
  • Posts: 3080
  • Joined: August 14th, 2005, 9:49 pm
  • Location: ATX

Post by sara farr »

BTW, remember that post I just posted to this thread, the one with the National Geographic photo of the lemur? Look at it again and tell me if the hand is not squeezing that little lemur and making his eyes bug out like a stress-relief toy. Poor little lemur!!
Post Reply