Speaking of which, here's a good ol' dose of
cognitive dissonance.
Despite everything, before I even knew this controversy even existed (and what I was originally going to post before looking into all this), it's still a children's adventure movie with CG animals that rips off Narnia harder than Eragon ripped off Star Wars or every WW2 shooter ripped off Saving Private Ryan's beach landing scene or Call of Duty ripped off the battle of Stalingrad from Enemy at the Gates. And I bet they won't even make
a witty rap song about it!
Producer: Our studio needs money. What should we make?
Pitcher: How about a movie where a man and a woman fall in love?
Producer: I like it!... So, what happens?
Pitcher: Ok. So we have this mystical, magical alternative universe, and it stars a little kid, and the little kid is all, like, going around and stuff, and... uh... there's talking animals, and they have sophisticated civilizations! And it's steampunk, so there'll be airships and swords and old-timey dresses and whatnot! Oh, and there's wizards! Wizards make everything that much more awesome!
Producer: We'll be r- But what about the love story?
Pitcher: We'll fit that in somewhere. We'll add it during the reshoots.
Producer: We'll be rich!
That, and it's currently got a 40% on
Rotten Tomatoes.
Note: My criticism has nothing to do with the controversy. It has to do with the fact that it's a movie where James Bond, Satine, and some little girl going on a quest involving CG animals and golden MacGuffins. Plus, it's got CG polar bears in the snow, and if that isn't a subliminal Coke ad, I don't know what is.