York99 wrote:On the same panel discussion in Oberlin that Jastroch mentioned, someone brought up that they don't even like to put the word 'improv' onto marketing materials. I loved that concept. We don't need to sell improv, we sell an experience that happens to be improv. People relate improv to stand-up or "Who's Line" or geeks with matching t-shirts. We need to change that whole perception.
Amen and we've discussed this on these forums a dozen times. And it's why I keep pushing the emotional angle. We have a product 90% of the people don't understand or have pre-formed opinions about. Therefore, we shouldn't sell our product, but what it does for you. However, I have a feeling that debate will just go round and round without resolution or agreement.
"Improv is now" is nice because you can change the lead in and keep it fresh. But merely having a lead in doesn't explain what improv is in any way. The sad fact is that "improv" is nihil dicit right now until we change that.
We do this in most things we do. We think what would be cool to us on the inside and fail to truly consider the wants, needs, impressions, concerns, or confusions of those who are outside looking in; those we are trying to reach. Let's at least do some rudimentary focus groups or something.