Skip to content

Group Think: Is there an official definition?

Everything else, basically.

Moderators: arclight, happywaffle

  • User avatar
  • Spots Offline
  • Posts: 1442
  • Joined: September 1st, 2009, 1:08 am
  • Location: New Orleans
  • Contact:

Group Think: Is there an official definition?

Post by Spots »

Yes, yes there is.



Consult with any friend who may be under its spell.


http://www.stanford.edu/~kcook/groupthink.html
  • User avatar
  • Spots Offline
  • Posts: 1442
  • Joined: September 1st, 2009, 1:08 am
  • Location: New Orleans
  • Contact:

Re: Group Think: Is there an official definition?

Post by Spots »

What if there was like digital evidence of these types of behaviors somewhere? What it could do for SCIENCE.
Image
  • User avatar
  • mpbrockman Offline
  • Posts: 2734
  • Joined: April 12th, 2007, 6:26 pm
  • Location: ATX
  • Contact:

Re: Group Think: Is there an official definition?

Post by mpbrockman »

Spots wrote:What if there was like digital evidence of these types of behaviors somewhere?
Tell me you're being sarcastic.

"Groupthink" doesn't have to conjure up the extremes of Nanking, My Lai, Nazism, Jonestown et al. One can see evidence of unanimity of opinion, interpersonal pressure, self-censorship & mindguards within any ideological or social movement, even freethought. It's easier than ever to promulgate today due to the internet & concomitant social media.

Check out the work of Irving Janis, who coined the term "groupthink"; and there's a decent bibliography here.

The science has been around for a good little while now; and it's a bit terrifying.
"He who is not a misanthrope at age forty can never have loved mankind" -Nicolas de Chamfort
www.perfectlyreasonabledreams.com
http://www.facebook.com/mpbrockman
Post Reply