Poor Harold. Can't get no respect.

Rev. Jordan T. Maxwell · July 20th, 2011, 8:48 am

beardedlamb wrote:I am too inebriated to post on this thread right now.

damn it...i love drunk Jeremy...

York99 · Post by **York99** » July 20th, 2011, 12:32 pm

Cody, Harold should always be capitalized. Have some reverence for the Master Form.

Craig Cackowski · Post by **Craig Cackowski** » July 29th, 2011, 2:11 pm

Hey guys, read this discussion with interest. I hope you can determine definitely whether the future of Austin improv is Harold or narrative, let me know how it works out!

On a self-promoting, somewhat related note, this reminded me that I did a podcast interview on Harold some years ago that might shed some light.

I guess I'm not allowed to post URLs, but Google cackowski group mind podcast, or something to that effect.

Yes, this was just an excuse for you to Google me. Hope everyone is well.

Roy Janik · Post by **Roy Janik** » July 29th, 2011, 2:21 pm

Craig Cackowski wrote:Hey guys, read this discussion with interest. I hope you can determine definitely whether the future of Austin improv is Harold or narrative, let me know how it works out!

I know this thread is a little contentious, but it points to what the future and the present of Austin Improv actually is... a melting pot where ideas can combine and butt heads in interesting ways. Not that that's necessarily unique to Austin, but it's an atmosphere I want to foster and grow.

LuBu McJohnson · Post by **LuBu McJohnson** » July 29th, 2011, 2:55 pm

Roy Janik wrote:
Craig Cackowski wrote:Hey guys, read this discussion with interest. I hope you can determine definitely whether the future of Austin improv is Harold or narrative, let me know how it works out!
I know this thread is a little contentious, but it points to what the future and the present of Austin Improv actually is... a melting pot where ideas can combine and butt heads in interesting ways. Not that that's necessarily unique to Austin, but it's an atmosphere I want to foster and grow.

That might've been a joke. Hard to tell when reading words without inflection.

Also, eat it Janik, shortform will win.

York99 · Post by **York99** » July 29th, 2011, 5:37 pm

LuBu McJohnson wrote:Also, eat it Janik, shortform will win.

Somewhere Gigglepants is plotting, and hoarding, and stockpiling, and giggling.

shando · Post by **shando** » August 3rd, 2011, 10:24 am

Craig Cackowski wrote:Hey guys, read this discussion with interest. I hope you can determine definitely whether the future of Austin improv is Harold or narrative, let me know how it works out!

On a self-promoting, somewhat related note, this reminded me that I did a podcast interview on Harold some years ago that might shed some light.

I guess I'm not allowed to post URLs, but Google cackowski group mind podcast, or something to that effect.

Yes, this was just an excuse for you to Google me. Hope everyone is well.

Can I just say that Craig Cackowski is in my top 3 improvisers of all time list? For reals. Glad to see him on our boards.

arthursimone · Post by **arthursimone** » August 8th, 2011, 7:03 pm

http://marketingcomedy.com/how-to-market-the-harold/

from the esteemed Kevin McShane of Trophy Wife