Time Warner Net bringing "Beaumont" style caps to

If you must!

Moderators: arclight, happywaffle

User avatar
York99
Posts: 1998
Joined: April 12th, 2006, 8:47 am
Location: There
Contact:

Post by York99 »

Multiple Post Justin making up for lost time:

Obviously this creates a lot of problems for a lot of consumers. Does this new proposal (even if canceled for now) have any benefit to the consumer other than low prices for those with low usage?
"Every cat dies 9 times, but every cat does not truly live 9 lives."
-Bravecat

Image
User avatar
Brian Boyko
Posts: 1163
Joined: March 18th, 2006, 2:48 am
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Post by Brian Boyko »

No, and low-usage customers won't save any money. They're not lowering prices - just adding caps.

Time Warner just announced that because Austin and Rochester and the other test markets "didn't like caps" that we're no longer going to be the test market for DOCSIS 3.0 technology (which essentially brings Fiber speeds via Cable.)

Of course, it really doesn't matter, because with a data cap, there's really no point in having DOCSIS 3.0 technology anyway. (50Mbps = 20GB/hr, so you'd blow through any sort of cap right away.)
User avatar
PaulM
Posts: 25
Joined: November 24th, 2008, 5:13 pm

Post by PaulM »

Brian Boyko wrote:...

Time Warner just announced that because Austin and Rochester and the other test markets "didn't like caps" that we're no longer going to be the test market for DOCSIS 3.0 technology (which essentially brings Fiber speeds via Cable.)

Of course, it really doesn't matter, because with a data cap, there's really no point in having DOCSIS 3.0 technology anyway. (50Mbps = 20GB/hr, so you'd blow through any sort of cap right away.)
Of course. The "No Soup for You!" marketing strategy. Keeping making those missteps, TWC.
Post Reply