Page 5 of 5

PostPosted: July 20th, 2011, 8:48 am
by Rev. Jordan T. Maxwell
beardedlamb wrote:I am too inebriated to post on this thread right now.


damn it...i love drunk Jeremy...

PostPosted: July 20th, 2011, 12:32 pm
by York99
Cody, Harold should always be capitalized. Have some reverence for the Master Form.

PostPosted: July 29th, 2011, 2:11 pm
by Craig Cackowski
Hey guys, read this discussion with interest. I hope you can determine definitely whether the future of Austin improv is Harold or narrative, let me know how it works out!

On a self-promoting, somewhat related note, this reminded me that I did a podcast interview on Harold some years ago that might shed some light.

I guess I'm not allowed to post URLs, but Google cackowski group mind podcast, or something to that effect.

Yes, this was just an excuse for you to Google me. Hope everyone is well.

PostPosted: July 29th, 2011, 2:21 pm
by Roy Janik
Craig Cackowski wrote:Hey guys, read this discussion with interest. I hope you can determine definitely whether the future of Austin improv is Harold or narrative, let me know how it works out!


I know this thread is a little contentious, but it points to what the future and the present of Austin Improv actually is... a melting pot where ideas can combine and butt heads in interesting ways. Not that that's necessarily unique to Austin, but it's an atmosphere I want to foster and grow.

PostPosted: July 29th, 2011, 2:55 pm
by LuBu McJohnson
Roy Janik wrote:
Craig Cackowski wrote:Hey guys, read this discussion with interest. I hope you can determine definitely whether the future of Austin improv is Harold or narrative, let me know how it works out!


I know this thread is a little contentious, but it points to what the future and the present of Austin Improv actually is... a melting pot where ideas can combine and butt heads in interesting ways. Not that that's necessarily unique to Austin, but it's an atmosphere I want to foster and grow.


That might've been a joke. Hard to tell when reading words without inflection.

Also, eat it Janik, shortform will win.

PostPosted: July 29th, 2011, 5:37 pm
by York99
LuBu McJohnson wrote:Also, eat it Janik, shortform will win.


Somewhere Gigglepants is plotting, and hoarding, and stockpiling, and giggling.

PostPosted: August 3rd, 2011, 10:24 am
by shando
Craig Cackowski wrote:Hey guys, read this discussion with interest. I hope you can determine definitely whether the future of Austin improv is Harold or narrative, let me know how it works out!

On a self-promoting, somewhat related note, this reminded me that I did a podcast interview on Harold some years ago that might shed some light.

I guess I'm not allowed to post URLs, but Google cackowski group mind podcast, or something to that effect.

Yes, this was just an excuse for you to Google me. Hope everyone is well.


Can I just say that Craig Cackowski is in my top 3 improvisers of all time list? For reals. Glad to see him on our boards.

PostPosted: August 8th, 2011, 7:03 pm
by arthursimone
http://marketingcomedy.com/how-to-market-the-harold/

from the esteemed Kevin McShane of Trophy Wife